Ainslie Wood Residents and Members of the
Media:
Below
are
the 20 questions sent by the Ainslie Wood Community Association to each
of
the 2018 Ward One candidates, along with the answers of those candidates
who
participated, in reverse alphabetical order.
Not
a
word from any of the answers has been cut or changed; I did make a few
minor
punctuation and formatting edits (e.g. changing a point-form list to a
sentence, with semi-colons replacing the line breaks) for the sake of
consistency and readability. A draft version was previously sent to the
candidates for comment.
This
is
a public document. Everyone is free to forward, post or otherwise share
this
information without permission.
If
you
have follow-up questions, the email addresses of all the candidates are
listed in the "to" line above.
Mark Coakley
AWCA Chair
============================
1. WHAT WILL BE YOUR MAIN PRIORITIES AS
COUNCILLOR?
Wilson --- I have a 5-point
platform: Stronger
Neighbourhoods for a Stronger City; Make Smarter Investments and Plan
with
Purpose; Create Safe Shared Streets; Enhance Our Public Spaces; Build
Better
Transit.
White --- My main
priorities, if elected,
will focus on improving the everyday lives on individuals in Ward 1.
Specific
issues I plan to focus on consist of: safer streets, improved
transparency,
improved co-ordination between the city and other stakeholders in ward
1,
improved policing as well as by-law enforcement, preserving the Hamilton
Aviary, and finding cost-saving measures such as the proposed motion to
change
our current waste-management strategy.
Narducci --- My main
priorities are Vision
Zero with street safety, moving forward with our transit (LRT), and
affordable
housing.
Massie ---
Economic Development
- Small business is a catalyst for revitalizing our neighbourhoods and
building
wealth. I want to support young adults with opportunities for work in
Ward 1 to
raise incomes and move our local economy forward. I also support
existing
community services that address the concentration of poverty, addiction
and
mental illness. Infrastructure and Housing - Ward 1's economy relies on
water,
electrical, facilities, safety services, and transit network
connections. We
need to build affordable housing for growing families, first-time
owners,
renters, newcomers, and our seniors. Stop the conversion of single
family
dwellings into multi-unit rentals. For example, not supporting variance
applications for rezoning and enforcement action on property standards
and
public safety including repurposing derelict homes and buildings.
Enhance, Protect
and Maintain Clean Greenspaces for Everyone - Ward 1's parks, forests
and
wetlands reduce air and water pollutants, provide wildlife habitat, and
benefit
everyone in the neighbourhood with a place for physical activity, stress
reduction and community interaction.
Lazich --- My main priorities as
councillor would
include the following: Ensuring that council is more fiscally
responsible;
Ensuring that council work together for the better good of Hamilton and
not
just each ward; Ensuring there is visionary leadership and strong
governance;
Advocate for the needs of all constituents in Ward 1 to ensure those
needs are
met whether its development, infrastructure or specific needs.
Geffos --- My platform has 4 pillars -- Community,
Housing,
Accountability, and Transit. Of these, the ones that need the most work
to
address are housing and transit. In terms of housing, I am committed to
increasing the amount of affordable housing by using the provincial
inclusionary
zoning legislation to mandate that developers include a percentage of
affordable and/or geared-to-income units in their new developments. As a
ward,
we have the highest degree of income disparity in the city, and the
majority of
low-income residents live in Ainslie Wood. As a member of our
neighbourhood, I
am also very familiar with the constant battle against absentee
landlords to
maintain their properties and protect their tenants. Cracking down on
absentee
landlords via landlord licensing would not only prevent deaths by
ensuring that
no units are rented that are not fully compliant with the fire code, but
would
also allow the city and residents to track infractions against a
landlord to
determine if a particular landlord has a pattern of property standards
and/or
other bylaw infractions against them. Regarding transit, the current
system is
not adequately meeting the needs of West Hamilton and Ainslie Wood in
particular. Many of our children rely on school route extras and the 51
University route to get them to school on time. The 51 University route
must
run year-round, and school route extras should never be first on the
chopping
block when the HSR is forced to cancel routes. I will also ensure that
council
fully funds the 10-year transit master plan, to make sure that our
transit
system is fully able to meet the needs of our growing city. In an
underfunded
transit system, the people who most need it are often those left behind
-- as a
regular transit user I can attest that busses are often unable to
accommodate
seniors and those with mobility devices, leaving some of the most
vulnerable
people in our society literally out in the cold.
Eroglu --- In Ward 1
violation of bylaws related
to rental housing and property use along with noise and hygiene problems
needs
to be addressed. Difficulties on enforcing by-laws such as property
standards,
parking and absentee landlords are making the situation worse. This
makes it
extremely difficult to maintain a balanced neighbourhood that students
and
non-student residents live in harmony at a safe environment with a sense
of
community. The neighbourhoods around McMaster are suffering from bylaw
violations for a long time. Secondly, for both Ward 1 and the City,
creating
safe and friendly streets that everybody feels welcomed. Enhancing a
walkable,
cyclable roads and developing more continuous paths for bikes are
essential. In
its current condition throughout our ward and the rest of the City, it
is hard
to say that our roads are safe to drive, walk or bike. The condition is
very
poor. Its been long neglected and needs our attention. Providing a
reliable, accessible and affordable public transportation is vital for
our ward
as well as for the City as a whole. By investing in our public services
wisely
we can make transportation, housing and access to arts and recreation
affordable and accessible to everyone. Another issue is addressing
poverty. This is one of my priorities. Sadly, so many families with
children in
Hamilton lives under the poverty line. People living and dying on our
streets,
children going school with empty stomach and parents working on
two-three jobs
and struggle for providing basic human needs for their families are not
acceptable.
Cole --- I have four
main priorities
highlighted below... i. Improved Public Transportation: Development and
ease of
accessibility to public and alternative transport, including integrated
rapid-transit solutions and safe, efficient cycling options. I do
strongly
support integrated LRT as a means of enhancing investment, growing our
economy
and providing convenient access to city-wide programs, services,
businesses and
institutions. (Please refer to SharonCole.ca for details); ii. Economic
Growth: Continued development of Ward 1 as an education and innovation
hub,
along with acting as a hive for small and independent businesses and
services.
This will be done with a keen respect and balance for the environmental
and
conservation needs of our vibrant and attractive community. (Please
refer to
SharonCole.ca for details); iii. Housing Solutions: Address the
increased cost
of housing with a focus on the diversified, evolving population base,
the needs
of established homeowners, renters and students and the challenge of
affordability and quality. (Please refer to SharonCole.ca for details);
iv.
Government Transparency and Collaboration: Champion a unified
decision-making
process for the betterment of the city by strengthening Council
solidarity and
respecting the opinions of each of Hamilton's unique communities.
(Please refer
to SharonCole.ca for details).
Anderson --- I have 7
areas which I would
focus on during my term: 1.1 Establishing and expanding communication
throughout the Ward and between the various entities which make it up
(residents, businesses, institutions) as well as between these entities
and
City Hall; 1.2 Education programs for residents related to City By-laws,
neighbour expectations, landlord and tenant legal obligations and
general home
ownership or rental chores; 1.3 Safe streets for all users including
cyclists,
pedestrians, transit users and drivers with the goal of zero deaths and
zero
serious injuries due to traffic accidents; 1.4 Affordable housing for
renters
and home owners. For home owners this would focus on decreasing taxes by
increasing density along key corridors; 1.5 Affordable, reliable and
resilient
infrastructure throughout the Ward and the City; 1.6 Making sure the
City
services you use everyday are meeting your expectations; 1.7 Making sure
that
your interactions with the City are mostly positive.
Allen --- My main
priorities would be
complete streets – striking a balance between cyclist, driver and
pedestrians
to ensure all can travel safely and effectively, safe neighbourhoods –
ensuring
by-laws are adhered to and making sure people feel safe in their
neighbourhood,
and smart development – ensuring development in the ward respects its
neighbourhood, and continues to meet the goals of our communities.
2. DO YOU HAVE A PLAN TO REACH OUT TO THE
VOTERS
LIVING IN THE HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS IN THE FAR WEST PART OF THE WARD?
Wilson --- I have and
will continue to
personally canvass these buildings. In addition, each resident in Ward 1
will
receive a Canada Post delivered flyer with an overview of my platform.
My
platform and other campaign activities are also available on the web and
social
media.
White --- It is
disappointing that reaching
voters within high-rises such as those found in the west part of Ainslie
Wood
is so difficult. My hope is that those who reside in locations that
aren't
easily accessible for me by foot, will notice lawn signs, my social
media
campaign or hear about me through word of mouth. I have also had people
who
live in some high-rises go door to door to inform residents about who I
am,
hopefully I can find someone willing to do the same for me in Ainslie
Wood.
Narducci --- Entrance to
apartment buildings
is limited and restricted to residents only. Canada Post does offer a
service
to deliver flyers and information via their letter carriers. The cost is
something my campaign is not investing in. There are many platforms for
residents of these high rises to gain information on all city wide
candidates;
Joey Coleman via 155 podcast, Raise The Hammer, The Silhouette, Cable
14, Cycle
Hamilton as well as each and every individuals social media platform.
With
limited access to these residents, perhaps your group could organize a
community Meet & Greet with all Ward 1 candidates and the residents
that
occupy these high-rise buildings. I am willing to work with Ainslee Wood
in
creating strong community involvement from students, residents and
perhaps a
representative from each of the high-rise buildings. Alternatively,
these
buildings could develop a CLC (Community Liason Committee) to best bring
their
needs to the table.
Massie --- I
am speaking with
voters in all areas of the Ward, have a website http://www.electmassie.ca/ and
lawn signs and
doorhanger cards with my platform - I have more work to do.
Lazich --- I plan on
canvassing those
apartment buildings to ensure they are aware of my candidacy.
Geffos --- Yes, in fact we have already canvassed
many of these voters.
As an apartment dweller and someone who has worked in housing advocacy,
it is
very important to me that we ensure that we engage with apartment
residents:
statistically, they are often living at or below the poverty line and
have many
distinct needs in terms of funding, resources, and access. It is my
intention,
once elected, to hold a series of meetings in different parts of the
ward in
order to connect with the voters living there and to ensure that they
are
having their voices heard. Some of these meetings will take place in the
lobbies or community rooms of high-rise apartment buildings. As an
organizer, I
have lived my life by the credo that you must meet people where they
already
are, and never expect them to simply come to you.
Eroglu --- Yes. I will try to
reach every voter
in Ward 1.
Cole --- Leading up to
the election I’ve
maintained a fulsome communication and outreach strategy for all
constituents,
including those in high-rises, which appears to be working. Following
the
election, I will as councillor, have a comprehensive communisation
strategy
that encompasses a variety mediums, print, newsletter, web, social media
to
keep all constituents informed and engaged.
Anderson --- I see
engagement of these
residents as starting through their condo boards, apartment managers or
the
City Housing department depending on the individual building. These
entities
should be able to provide a common gateway to reach all residents in
their
buildings through already established communication channels.
Allen --- Yes I do. As I
have limited time
available to me for door knocking due to the shortened campaign period
and the
fact that I work full time outside the home, I will be using some
creative
strategies to reach out to those residents.
3. WILL YOU STRIVE TO BRING ABOUT A VIABLE
COMMUNITY
CENTRE WHICH WOULD SERVE THE LARGE AREA OF AINSLIE WOOD?
Wilson --- Yes. I
believe that Ainslie Wood
is presently under serviced in terms of its public amenities. Strong and
healthy neighbourhoods are safe, connected, green, active and inclusive
places.
Public amenities are magnets in attracting permanent residents,
including young
families.
White --- I am assuming
by the term
community centre you mean a recreation facility for the community. I am
not
opposed to looking into the viability of that, however it is not a
decision I
can do on my own. It would need to make logistical sense and be
advocated for
by community members. Due to the many other contributing factors that go
into a
community centre, it is a city decision and something that we would need
to
convince the other councils that this project is one that is desired and
will
be utilized by the community.
Narducci --- I feel this question
is in alignment with
your question 14, 15, 16 & 18 . I believe community rec centers and
libraries are a hub for a community. They make communities livable and
bring
social groups and families together. Creating a Master Plan is a
community
initiative. I would look forward to working with your community on this
with
the Alexander Park/French Public School Board space. Ainslee Wood like
much of
Hamilton is in the process of evolution. Your streets that were once
filled
with young families have quieted. Having something (rec
center/library/park) to
go to will draw more families back. Due to the location of Ainslie Wood
and
McMaster there will always be a student population that will require
work to
create a respectful cohabitating area. I would encourage Ainslee Wood to
create
a Master Plan/vision as to what the area would look like, what is
needed, what
costs are, get the funds directed to you, fairly.
Massie ---
Yes, Ainslie Woods,
North, and Anislie Woods West needs a community centre - Dalewood is not
close
enough.
Lazich --- I believe
every community should
have access to their own multi use centre that provides space for a
variety of
activities and learning opportunities for all age groups.. A community
centre
is a gathering place that would help nurture a healthy community.
Geffos --- Yes. While the West End Diner and
Fortino’s community room
are great, they cannot and should not be the only community
infrastructure
available to Ainslie Wood residents when we want to meet, plan, and
organize.
The Ainslie Wood community hub is an important project which has my full
support. As an Ainslie Wood resident, the lack of bookable community
infrastructure has been deeply frustrating for me. I believe strongly
that all
communities do best when they have access to infrastructure that allows
them to
meet as a community, and given the high percentage of young families
that
reside in Ainslie Wood (and the apartments on Whitney and Main St W in
particular)
it is vital that we move forward on the Ainslie Wood community hub.
Eroglu --- I believe in
investing in people. A
viable community centre is necessary for Ainslie Wood area to serve the
community.
Cole --- Yes. I
believe in furthering the
work to bring a centre to the property adjacent to Alexander Park thus
creating
a truly multi-use, community and recreational environment.
Anderson --- Yes. I would
like to see a
partnership with the YMCA or similar organization for the operation of
the facility.
Allen --- Yes. I was a
vocal proponent of
this initiative when I sat on PBAC in years two and thee of the
initiative, and
still support such a concept.
4. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE PARTICIPATORY BUDGET
MONEY
SET ASIDE FOR AINSLIE WOOD MUST BE SPENT IN AINSLIE WOOD?
Wilson --- Yes.
Narducci --- Yes, I do
believe that it should
have been/should be. Again, having a Master Plan will enable the
community to
work towards something, thus justifying the money needed. At the end of
the day
the councilor is representing all residents of Ward 1 this includes
Ainslee
Wood, Strathcona, Westdale, Kirkendall and must be held accountable as
such. If
a particular neighborhood is in need of resources, that neighbourhood
should be
prioritized.
Massie ---
Yes, fairness can not
be taken for granted.
Lazich --- Whatever
money has been
specifically designated to Ainslie wood should be used / spent in
Ainslie Wood
and not redirected to other projects.
Geffos --- Absolutely. Ainslie Wood, and the AWCA in
particular, fought
hard for the designated PBAC money and it should be spent in Ainslie
Wood. My
understanding is that the outgoing councillor’s office worked hard in
collaboration with the AWCA on this issue, and I look forward to
continuing
this relationship.
Eroglu --- Yes,
absolutely. Participatory
budget set aside for Ainslie Wood must be spend in Ainslie wood. It is
not
acceptable to use this budget for any other purposes and neglect the
needs of
the Ainslie Wood community.
Cole --- Yes, I
believe it should. In the
case of unused funds, it should be the PBAC that helps determine how
these
funds would be further used or allocated.
Anderson --- Yes.
Allen --- Yes.
5. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE PBAC SYSTEM SHOULD
CONTINUE, BE MODIFIED, OR DONE AWAY WITH ENTIRELY?
Wilson --- I was a PBAC
member in 2016-2017.
It was a valuable opportunity to listen and learn about the needs and
circumstances of each of Ward 1's four neighbourhoods. However, it is
not
without its challenges. The future of PBAC will likely be determined by
the
next Hamilton City Council as it is directly related to a broader
taxation
issue. The city of Hamilton's ward boundaries (with the exception of
Ward 1)
have recently been redrawn to better reflect population changes across
the
city. There are now some new wards that include areas that did not
previously
have access to the annual discretionary infrastructure funding. These
areas did
not have access to the funding because they were outside the original 8
wards
of the amalgamated City of Hamilton. The tax shift that occurred
following
amalgamation was to reflect the fact that the original 8 wards were
paying a
disproportionate share of taxation. In 2011, City Council decided that
instead
of passing these tax savings on to residents of Wards 1 to 8, $1.5
million
would be allocated annually to the ward councillor for discretionary
spending
on hard infrastructure such as sidewalks. The next City Council will
have to
determine whether it is fair and feasible for such an arrangement to
continue.
Separate and apart from this, the question I have asked myself is this:
is the
PBAC system the best vehicle to enhance the capacity of residents to
understand
and participate in city building? My platform calls on each of Ward 1's
neighbourhood associations to consider forming a community council to
meet
regularly with the Ward 1 Councillor. This is a model that is working
very well
for neighbourhoods in Ward 2. Neighbourhood associations are able to
form
relationships, learn from the best practice of others and meet regularly
with
their elected city councillor. If discretionary funds remain available, I
would
consult with each neighbourhood association to determine their views on
the
best capacity building method to invest these funds. Moreover, we must
ensure a
system of financing that is equitable and does not favour one
neighbourhood
over others.
White --- The
Participatory Budget Advisory
Committee program is a good idea in theory, but unfortunately was spent
in
areas with the loudest people rather than dispersed evenly through out
the ward.
I would modify the current system, as I like the concept of having
residents
decide where to spend the money, but with stricter guidelines than were
in
place currently.
Narducci --- When the
participatory budget was
introduced it was because of excess tax dollars from Ward 1. As
development has
increased, and growth continues, home and property owners continue to
see their
taxes increase despite the apparent excess $1.5 million. I believe that
constituents should still be involved in community development,
throughout the
year, and not merely when excess funds arise. Many constituents have
expressed
disappointment with this slush fund of $1.5 million of extra money, that
was
meant for infrastructure but has been used for other, non-infrastructure
related projects. It would be in the best interest of constituents to
receive a
tax cut, not a rainy day piggy bank.
Massie --- I
am running to
allocate the money competently and effectively. As a councillor I should
be
doing this kind of extensive citizen consultation already - I don't care
for
unnecessary marketing spin at taxpayers expense. I would modify the
process to
have practical timelines and costing to make informed decisions -
cooperation
between the city and residents with a focus on what the community truly
wants
and values.
Lazich --- I feel that
the original purpose
for area rating has changed considerably to the detriment of its real
purpose
which was for infrastructure only. There is also the issue that the PBAC
does
not involve all areas of Ward 1 or that money is not distributed in a
fair
manner. Therefore, I would like to see the Area rating money return to
its
original intent which is to fix our infrastructure which we need to
desperately.
Geffos --- In its current form, the capital behind
PBAC comes from area
rating. Like many candidates throughout Hamilton, I believe that the
area
rating system must be abolished: at present, it causes poor transit
service for
the upper city and suburban wards, and places an unfair tax burden on
the lower
city. However, regardless of its source the councillor’s office will
continue
to have discretionary spending. It is my strong belief that all
discretionary
spending must be community driven and backed, and I believe that PBAC or
something like it will continue to have a role to play in deciding how
we
allocate capital in our communities. I will also ensure that Ward One
residents
are consulted before council enters into discussions regarding the
City’s
general budgetary spending to ensure that the projects we need to see
happen in
our communities are addressed. Regardless of the future of PBAC it is
vital
that we bring more residents into our decisions at Council. I understand
that
the current structure of PBAC is not without its criticism, and given
that its
future will likely be determined by the outcome of the area rating
conversation, I look forward to discussing the future form and structure
of
PBAC with residents after the election.
Eroglu --- I believe it
should continue but can
be modified to be more inclusive and be fair. Participatory Budgeting
Advisory
Committee (PBAC) oversees the process and engages residents in
developing and
selecting infrastructure projects in the Ward, as well as it advises the
Councillor on Participatory Budgeting Issues. I think it has a lot of
benefits
as long as the engagement and consulting done right.
Cole --- Yes, I
believe it should continue
with the understanding that new technologies for community engagement
will
require continued review of the processes to connect the community,
including
the expanded role digital engagement and social media plays in the
collaborative process.
Anderson --- I think
whether PBAC continues at
all depends heavily on whether area rating, its current funding source,
continues to exist. If it does continue, I would like to see the money
split
evenly between the neighbourhoods. Over the longer term I would like to
see the
entire City budget opened up to resident participation.
Allen --- The ForWard1
process – which I
was proud to champion in is early days – has become more of a challenge
recently, especially when it comes to even distribution of money, and
investment in genuine needs of the community. I am proposing a re-set of
the
committee with renewed terms of reference, after consultation with the
community.
6. WILL YOU ENSURE THAT THE SAME PROPERTY
STANDARDS
THAT APPLY TO HOMEOWNERS WILL ALSO APPLY TO AND BE ENFORCED WITH
BUSINESSES AND
THE RENTAL HOUSES THAT EXIST IN OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD? WE ARE REFERRING TO
LAWN
MAINTENANCE, SNOW AND GARBAGE REMOVAL.
Wilson --- Strong
neighbourhoods are safe,
clean and healthy places to live. There is little value in having the
sidewalks
of four houses cleared, if one or more adjacent homes leave theirs
unplowed.
There is growing evidence that social isolation has negative health
impacts.
Our older residents, particularly in the winter, are at greater risk of
being
shut in and losing contact with others if they are unable to safely move
throughout their neighbourhoods. The City of Hamilton must act, plan and
budget
to support Hamilton's vision - - to be the best city to raise a child
and age
successfully. The enforcement of property standards must also be guided
by this
vision, regardless of whether the property is owned by a business or a
landlord.
White --- I can promise
that any issues
brought to my attention will be rectified, and no individual or business
will
be exempt from the rules. I intend on working with the other Councillors
elected to improve the level of by-law enforcement and consistency of
the
enforcement.
Narducci --- I see my role
as a representative
of all community members. Tensions between residents are a normal part
of city
life. All residents can experience moments of disagreement. This is
where
mediation skills matter. It comes back to listening, understanding what
the
real concerns are and then finding ways forward that are mutually
satisfying.
Sometimes that might mean by-law enforcement; sometimes bringing people
together for conversations is a better option. The students I’ve spoken
with
have expressed a need for clarity from the City on what’s expected from
them as
residents of Ward 1. For example, they don’t arrive knowing the garbage
bylaws
and that information is actually really hard to find. Suddenly a notice
appears
on their doors - but no one has communicated the bylaws to them. The
city could
do a better job of helping them find the information they need so they
can
avoid conflict with neighbors. They like long-term residents are
frustrated
with absentee landlords who don’t maintain properties.
Massie ---
Yes.
Lazich --- Yes! I
believe in applying
/ensuring that universal property standards are met in all areas and
enforced
accordingly. No exemptions or special treatment.
Geffos --- Yes. Our proposed peer-to-peer proactive
bylaw education and
enforcement will apply to all residents of Ainslie Wood and Westdale,
not just
student residents. It will also free up resources currently directed
primarily
at student housing to ensure that we are able to appropriately maintain
and
enforce property standards and bylaw adherence throughout Ward One.
Eroglu --- Yes, definitely.
We need to continue
working with McMaster administration, landlords, businesses, developers
and the
City in order to solve the problem regarding by-law violation and
enforce at a
minimum to meet the property standards that are fair and ensures that
properties are being adequately maintained.
Cole --- Yes, I
believe the responsibility
for the compliance of property standards rests with the property owner,
regardless of how such standards/activates are delegated or devolved to
renters, students, etc.
Anderson --- Yes. By-laws
and their
enforcement should apply equally to all properties in the Ward including
those
owned by the City.
7. WILL YOU SUPPORT LRT?
Wilson --- Yes, for
several reasons. We have
been planning for Hamilton's LRT since 1961 and over $100 million has
already
been invested in the project. Hamilton residents pay some of the highest
property taxes in Ontario. We are also burdened with a $3 billion
infrastructure deficit. Our city needs a plan of action. LRT is part of
the
solution. It will attract new investors, enrich our tax base, bring jobs
to
Hamilton and grow our local economy. LRT is an important piece in
improving our
overall transit system and it will also reduce air pollution from
vehicle
emissions.
White --- I support the
LRT, the improved
infrastructure that the LRT will bring as well as the improvements to
transit
it should facilitate. I look forward to ensuring that the LRT is the
least
disruptive as possible during it's construction.
Narducci --- Yes I do.
Massie ---
Yes, I support LRT,
and bus transit expansion and funding - a vital public utility.
Lazich --- I support the
implementation of
the HSR BLAST system using state of the art electric buses that will
service
all Hamiltonians for half the cost and we can then use the balance of
the money
for infrastructure needs.
Geffos --- Yes. While I know that it can sometimes
be a divisive issue,
as a regular user of the B line and someone with a mobility device I am
strongly in favour of the LRT as the only truly accessible mass transit
available to us at this time. As our residents grow older, it is vital
that
they are able to access health and social services downtown and in the
east end
in a prompt and accessible manner.
Eroglu --- I support LRT. I
believe LRT will
provide accessible, affordable, reliable and comfortable means of public
transportation that connects residents not only within the City but
provides
foundation for future developments. However, I hear a lot of concerns
about
potential increase of residential taxes. Businesses are concerned about
loosing
customers during construction. These concerns are legitimate and needs
to be
addressed. I believe that open communication, engagement and
transparency are
deeply important for achieving the desired result.
Cole --- Yes. As
mentioned above, I
do strongly support integrated LRT as a means of enhancing investment,
growing
our economy and providing convenient access to city-wide programs,
services,
businesses and institutions.
Anderson --- Yes, however I
think some
adjustments need to be made to the proposed traffic flow changes along
King
Street.
Allen --- Yes. I have
been very outspoken
on this issue, and feel my position is well known. Hamilton needs to
honour its
commitments and build the system so many are expecting.
8. WILL YOU ENDEAVOR TO CONDUCT YOURSELF IN A RESPECTFUL AND
NON-PARTISAN MANNER WITH YOUR COLLEAGUES AT CITY HALL?
Wilson --- My commitment
is to serve as a
role model for our youngest residents, including my children. I have
received
endorsements from city leaders of all different political stripes. This
is
proof that I have demonstrated the ability to work with others, find
common
ground and lead.
White --- At the end of
the day, politics
is about compromise. It is about finding the best possible solution for
any and
all stakeholders involved in a given situation. If elected, I look
forward to
working with my colleagues of all political affiliations and hold no
outright
contempt for any personal basis. That being said, I will not back down
on
issues that I do not agree with, or feel will be negative for my
constituents,
or the City of Hamilton as a whole.
Narducci --- Saddens me
that this has to be a
question, it should be expected of all elected officials.
Massie ---
Yes, in order to get
things done you have to look for common ground and be willing to work
together.
Lazich --- Yes! I will
ensure that I conduct
myself in nothing less than a professional manner, respecting my fellow
councillors despite any differences that might arise.
Geffos --- Yes.
While I do have a background in partisan politics, I am very experienced
at
sitting on committees and advocacy groups where not all individuals
share the
same political affiliation. I believe very strongly that municipal
governance
and local issues are spaces where everyone, regardless of political
affiliation, can and should come together to work on the material issues
that
affect us as residents, regardless of what our backgrounds are.
Eroglu --- I am proud of my non-partisan campaign. I am
not affiliated to any
political entity and will be only serving to the community. I profoundly
care
about this community and I know I can make a real impact and represent
Ward 1
in a transparent, engaging, and progressive manner with the interests of
people
always prioritized. For me, it is all about community and leadership, it
is not
about politics but people.
Cole ---
Yes. As mentioned
above, I believe in a unified decision-making process for the betterment
of the city by strengthening Council solidarity and respecting each
other’s
opinions, including the opinions of each of Hamilton's unique
communities.
Anderson --- Yes. However
this does not mean
that there will not be disagreements.
Allen --- I always
conduct myself in a
respectful and non-partisan way. That won’t change once I’m elected.
9. THE BOARDED UP PROPERTIES ON MAIN ST. W. BETWEEN EWEN AND RIFLE
RANGE, AS
WELL THE EMPTY PROPERTY BETWEEN THE RAIL TRAIL ON RIFLE RANGE AND MAIN
ST. W.
ARE EYESORES IN OUR COMMUNITY. THEY ARE LITTERED WITH GARBAGE AND
GRAFFITI.
THIS AREA IS A HIGHLY VISIBLE AND WELL-TRAVELLED AREA AS IT IS CLOSE TO
MCMASTER UNIVERSITY AND INNOVATION PARK. HOW WILL YOU ENSURE THE
CLEAN-UP AND
CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF THESE PROPERTIES AS WELL AS OTHER BUSINESSES
WHO DON'T
SEEM TO HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE SAME PROPERTY STANDARDS AS HOMEOWNERS?
Wilson --- There are no
neutral spaces in
cities. Each space is a result of choice and a reflection of values.
When a
space is made ugly by unwanted graffiti and litter on a consistent basis
it
means that we have allowed our expectations for that space to be lowered
and
our city building practices, including enforcement, are living up to
those
lowered expectations. We need to change our expectations and the city
must lead
by showing others that the space is valued. As a ward 1 Councillor, I
would
meet with senior city management to set out the expectations of the
space and
request regular ongoing activity reports on how our enforcement activity
is
supporting the value we give to the space. If municipal government does
not
lead in caring for its public space, how can we expect private
businesses to
follow suit? I would meet personally with business owners and relay the
same
expectations. I will attend as many neighbourhood BIA meetings as
possible and
convey to business owners and operators the expectations our
neighbourhood has
of their spaces. Conversations and relationship building is important. I
will
be vigilant and do all that is legally possible to raise the
expectations we
have of both public and private spaces.
White --- I am not
ashamed to admit that
currently I am unsure of who owns that property and will need to look
into it.
I believe that abandoned and ignored problems are not an issue for any
one part
of Hamilton but rather a city issue. I hope to work with other
Councillors to
ensure a city-wide strategy, such as increasing fines for recurring
offenders,
to improve property management in all forms. Snow removal is a major
priority
for me as it is more than just an eyesore, it is a safety hazard. As a
safety
hazard as well as an accessibility issue, I believe snow and ice removal
should
be treated more seriously than other forms of property maintenance.
Narducci --- This past
weekend I participated in
a city wide Alley Beautification event. I support community interests in
being
proactive in caring for our spaces, regardless of where or whom garbage
and
graffiti comes from. Businesses should be held accountable to the same
standard. Let’s look at why there are gaps in this enforcement or lack
of
interest on behalf of the business owners to comply.
Massie --- I
would apply steps
from the private and unionized sector that get results: have an
objective (a
clean, attractive community space), determine the tasks (city manpower,
cost,
garbage disposal and graffiti removal, proper enforcement, community
clean up help, tree planting, lighting, etc), timescale, and
monitor/measure
progress.
Lazich --- As mentioned,
I would ensure that
a universal property standards document be implemented so that all the
same
rules and regulations apply to all homeowners, landlords and tenants.
Should
these rules and regulations not be followed then strict fines should be
implemented . Everyone needs to be held accountable for their property.
Geffos --- The owners of these properties must be
held accountable for
their maintenance. One of the reasons that I am excited about our
proposed
peer-to-peer bylaw education and enforcement program (as referenced
above and
which is detailed on page 9 of my platform available at sophiegeffros.ca/platform) is that it
will free up resources to ensure that all properties in Ward One are
maintained, and will ensure there are consequences for property owners
who do
not maintain their lots. These people must be held to the same standards
as all
property owners in our city. It is also worth noting that this is not
just an
issue of aesthetics -- the litter present attracts wildlife at a time
when
Hamilton is dealing with a rabies outbreak. I take these issues very
seriously
and will ensure that these property owners are held accountable for
their
actions or lack thereof.
Eroglu ---
Constant and open
communication between landlords, businesses, developers and the City is
very
important in order to solve the problems around property standards and
by-law
violation. Enforcement of by-law regardless of the ownership must for at
a
minimum to meet the property standards that are fair and ensures that
properties
are being adequately maintained.
Cole --- I
believe in
enforcement initiatives and penalties up to and including expropriation
as a
means of both clean-up and redevelopment to transform the ward’s
derelict
and/or vacant brownfields and properties and put life back into those
long-lost
industrial, business and residential locations.
Anderson --- By-law
enforcement is the main
tool available to address these issues however it is mostly complaint
based. I
would reach out to the property owners to attempt to determine what
could be
done to reduce the repeated issues. I would also work with City staff to
determine whether additional garbage cans could be placed in these areas
until
the construction begins.
Allen --- By law
standards need to be
adhered to regardless of whether the property is owned by a business or a
resident. I will work with by law enforcement to ensure the properties
are
either brought into compliance, or city staff be tasked with doing the
work,
and the cost then added to the property tax bill.
10. THE AINSLIE WOOD NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTINUALLY
STRUGGLES WITH PARKING VIOLATIONS ON THEIR STREETS. WHY IS THIS ONLY
ADDRESSED
ON A COMPLAINT BASIS WHERE WESTDALE AREA SEEMS TO HAVE PROACTIVE
ENFORCEMENT?
Wilson --- Similar to my
answer in question
9, the councillor for the ward must be clear in setting out the
expectations
for how a neighbourhood is to be cared for and administered. My
commitment is
to ensure that each of Ward 1's four neighbourhoods are treated
equitably and
fairly. My immediate and ongoing meetings with enforcement officials
would
convey this expectation very clearly. My commitment to meeting with Ward
1
neighbourhood associations would provide me insight from residents as to
whether the city is practicing what we are preaching.
White --- I cannot
speak for the current
structure of the by-law enforcement. I am unsure on their directives or
their
specific policies regarding patrol. I know that by-law patrol and
enforcement
is a very underfunded venture which at times often makes enforcement
seem
sporadic. I plan on working with the rest of the city to improve by-law
enforcement. It is clear that the current system is not working. I
believe it
is an issue of poor policy rather than an intentional ignorance.
Narducci --- I would be
interested in knowing
exact numbers. How much enforcement there is in Westdale compared to
Ainslee
Wood. Can you find that out? Having lived in the Ward 1 area for over 30
years
we too have experienced this. It has been my experience that my
community as
well has had to be proactive with parking violations. The neighbors
watch and
when needed a call to City Hall is made for enforcement. There is a fire
hydrant on my corner which regularly has vehicles parked in front of and
a call
is made.
Massie ---
Parking issues are
not new, but the number of complaints has increased. Many enforcement
requests
include overnight parking, parking for more than set hours, vehicles
parked too
close to driveways, and commercial vehicles parked on residential
streets.
Also intensification means that less space is available to park
passenger
vehicles - all new developments need to have planned parking for more
than the number of units, improve existing public road allowances, and
move to
a citywide operational and not reactionary enforcement.
Lazich --- Parking
violations are a
universal problem and once again should be dealt with on a consistent
basis. No
matter where the violations occur especially for those who pay for
permit
parking and can’t park, the fines should be extremely high in order to
deter
illegal parking.
Geffos --- Street parking is an issue throughout the
ward, but
particularly in Ainslie Wood and Westdale. Conversations in other parts
of the
ward have led to discussions about what a street-by-street parking
strategy
looks like in this ward. Some areas would like parking by permit only on
residential streets, while others would like designated parking spots
for
street parking whose use is enforced. I strongly believe that proactive
enforcement is vital: as above, my proposed proactive education campaign
would
free up community, bylaw, and policing resources which can then be
dedicated to
issues such as parking and safer streets. Ainslie Wood is often
forgotten about
in discussions about Ward One, which I find both ridiculous on a
political
level and mildly offensive as an Ainslie Wood resident. Ainslie Wood
residents
deserve to have our complaints and voices taken as seriously as those
who
reside in other areas of the ward.
Eroglu --- I am aware of the
problem and agree
that it is ignored for a long time. The enforcement should be the same
for
every part of Ward 1. I will make sure that all the neighbourhood in
Ward 1
gets the same amount of resources and attention.
Cole --- I ask the
same question.
Enforcement should be proactive, not just reactive; however that is just
one
factor in the equation. It also takes education, raising awareness and
assessing the adequacy of the current systems/resources being put
forward to
assist with enforcement.
Anderson --- It would be
interesting to review
the tickets issued over the past few years and compare the two areas. I
do not
have access to this information so I cannot provide a factual response.
However
I suspect that the potential difference is partly due to the Westdale
BIA and
the fact that Westdale has areas of metered parking. It seems to me that
metered parking would make it easier to prove that a vehicle has been
parked
for longer than their allotted time and therefore make it easier to
issue tickets.
Allen --- I can’t speak
to the history of
this decision, but I support expanding the commissionaire program into
Ainslie
Wood, and will investigate expanding this shortly after taking office.
11. FOUR STUDENTS HAVE BEEN HIRED BY THE CITY
TO DEAL
WITH PROPERTY STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT FOR THIS AREA. HOW IS IT THAT
COMPLAINTS
STILL MUST BE MADE TO HAVE THESE BYLAWS ENFORCED?
Wilson --- Probably
because property
standards is not considered a priority and the city has lowered its
expectations regarding student housing/absentee landlords. The ward
councillor
must champion this cause and set out expectations.
White --- I believe
that this is again an
issue of poor policy and implementation. I believe that current policies
likely
encourage by-law officers to focus on specific enforcement, such as
meter
parking, rather than say permit parking. I plan on seriously reviewing
the
by-law enforcement protocol if elected.
Narducci --- This is
community involvement.
Bylaw cannot be everywhere seeing every violation. I’m sure that they
are
grateful that the community is engaged with them so they can do their
job.
Massie ---
We cannot rely on
tenants and neighbours to collect all the property standard violations
on their
own. Too many landlords are absentee and need to be held accountable. It
requires more staff manpower and time to enforce bylaws and fines need
to
levied to cover successful prosecution costs. You have to pick your
battles
given the scale of the problem and the resources available - I would
start by
targeting problematic landlords.
Lazich --- This is
evidence that this
project is ineffective and should be reviewed. It needs to be assessed
with all
stakeholders involved to ensure these students were given the tools
/information and authority to complete their tasks. If all requirements
were
met without success then the program needs to reassessed.
Geffos --- This is a problem: despite these
investments property
standards continue to be enforced on a complaint basis. That’s why I am
committed to a peer-to-peer proactive bylaw education and enforcement
for all
residents of Ainslie Wood and Westdale, not just students. I look
forward to
partnering with these property standards officers, McMaster University,
and the
City of Hamilton to ensure that everyone -- not just student residents
-- will
be able to benefit from proactive peer-to-peer bylaw education and
enforcement.
It is always better to address problems before they become sources of
distress
for the neighbourhood, whether or not it reaches a point that is legally
actionable.
Eroglu --- This is something
needs to be
addressed. I believe open communication, transparency and public
engagement.
Bylaw violation is violation whether somebody complains about it or not.
City
should be proactive enforcing non-conformance.
Cole --- Like my
response to question #10,
I again ask the same question and respond similarly. Enforcement should
be
proactive, not just reactive; however that is just one factor in the
equation.
It also takes education, raising awareness and assessing the adequacy of
the
current systems/resources being put forward to assist with enforcement,
including enhancing licensing bylaws, increasing enforcement officers,
etc.
Anderson --- I think
proactive by-law enforcement
is something that must be carefully approached. It is quite possible
that a
number of residents are unknowingly violating by-laws which are not
disturbing
anyone (e.g. garbage stored responsibly in side yards is against the
by-law
which says all garbage containers must be in rear yards or inside the
garage).
Complaints indicate which by-law violations are causing problems for
neighbours
and therefore should be a priority for enforcement. If left to the
discretion
of the officers the program may result in over enthusiastic ticketing
which can
quickly become a nuisance for all residents.
Allen --- The two
efforts should complement
each other. Four students on a part-time basis can’t be everywhere, but
should
be addressing by-law issues when they see them. With the additional
input of
residents, we can reach the goal of ensuring by-laws in Ainslie Wood are
adhered to.
12. DO YOU OPPOSE OR SUPPORT WIDENING THE 403
TO ALLOW
INCREASED VEHICLE TRAFFIC (AND AIR POLLUTION) BESIDE AINSLIE WOOD?
Wilson --- Oppose. There
is absolutely no
evidence to prove that widening of highways assists in mitigating
congestion.
As the famous urbanist Lewis Mumford said, "Building new roads to
prevent
congestion is like a fat man loosening his belt to prevent obesity."
White --- No, I do not
believe the 403
needs to be widened at this time.
Narducci --- The 403 is a
provincial highway
governed by provincial government. I am personally not a commuter but
over the
years in having to do daily travel to Burlington for my daughter’s
gymnastics,
traffic is horrible. The reality is that there is traffic. I would much
rather
have this flow of traffic on the highways than through our city streets.
As a
city we need to be aware of strategies to combat and help the
environment with
air pollution management.
Massie --- I
think that all
options need to be considered and deliberated on behalf of Ainslie Woods
community who will be affected by any highway widening - just building
an extra
lane will help but not solve the causes of congestion and bottleneck
issues on
the 403.
Lazich --- The issue of
the 403 is a
provincial matter but if all studies do not meet required healthy living
standards then the project needs to be revisited.
Geffos --- I oppose this. Studies have shown that
widening highways not
only increases air pollution but perhaps counter-intuitively it has
little to
no impact on road congestion and some studies show that it actually
increases
congestion.
Eroglu --- I don’t support
widening the 403. I
support improving public transportation and less cars on roads.
Cole --- There are
differing opinions with
respect to whether widening increases traffic and/or air pollution. The
403
section being referred to, routinely faces significant traffic
congestion
issues which results in vehicles travelling slower or idling which does
negatively impact pollution from emissions. While I generally support
the logic
of widening as a means of moving traffic faster, it is still premature
to fully
comment given that the Transportation Ministry is still conducting
environmental assessments and design studies on the entire 403 route
plan.
Anderson --- If a 403
widening needed to occur
I would propose the alternative of building a second level above the
current
driving surface and enclosing the stretch of 403 from Iroquois Heights
Conservation Area to the Aberdeen Interchange in a concrete tunnel. The
tunnel
could have its exterior surface designed to look similar to the
escarpment and
possibly be designed to accommodate recreational purposes. The tunnel
venting
would be designed to direct pollutants away from residential areas and
possibly
incorporate scrubbers. Pollution levels should also decrease over time
as more
electric vehicles displace gas powered ones.
Allen --- I oppose this
idea. Nor am I
aware of any viable proposal to do so.
13. DO YOU HAVE A PLAN TO INCREASE PUBLIC
GREENSPACE
IN AINSLIE WOOD?
Wilson --- My platform
recognizes connected
greenspace as an urban amenity and ecological necessity. The City of
Hamilton
is presently constructing an urban forest strategy (take the survey
available
on the City's website) with a report scheduled for Council's
consideration in
December, 2018. I would support a strategy that aimed to: Develop an
inventory
of Hamilton's street canopy. New York City has used open data and
collaborate
learning to inventory every single street tree in the Big Apple. The
inventory
includes the size, condition and species of each tree and it forms the
basis of
the city's urban forestry strategy. Over 2000 volunteers were trained
and
provided with user-friendly survey tools. The city has made this
inventory
available online and residents are encouraged to contribute to the
database,
organize tree-care groups, highlight their favourite trees and submit
service
requests. Set targets for greenspace. (Re)design utility corridors to
ensure
they can also function as greenspace. Ensure that tree canopy targets
and
policies are adhered to the city's development review policies. Explore
partnerships with other public agencies to enhance greenspace.
White --- I have a plan
to improve
beautification of all areas in Ward 1 and the City of Hamilton. I would
like to
see improved green spaces wherever possible, but that is not always
easy. Ward
1 has a significant amount of green space already, more than anywhere
else in
the city. I look forward to preserving the spaces we already have, but
establishing new green space will be difficult with the need for
increased
housing. I plan on following the master plan for parks and trails in
Hamilton,
in which Ainslie Wood holds an important role. I would be open to
hearing any
suggestions regarding preservation or implementation of public green
space in
Ainslie Wood.
Narducci --- I support
creating and increasing
greenspaces in all areas of Ward 1 and Hamilton. Urban Forest Strategy
has a
plan that would benefit areas like Ainslee Wood. We need to leverage off
wheels
that are already in motion.
Massie ---
It is a key part of
my platform to enhance, maintain, clean and protect the greenspaces like
Alexander Park and Stroud Park, and look for opportunities for the city
to
acquire or improve existing greenspaces. Also need a community centre
for year
round healthy activities.
Lazich --- The more
greenspace the better!
however this would need to be presented to the constituents for their
input and
comments to determine the needs, whether its parks or walking paths etc
there
needs to be a public consultation to determine best practices.
Geffos --- Yes. I am very committed to increasing
public greenspace
throughout the Ward, and members of my campaign team were heavily
involved in
OPIRG’s “Save Our Street Trees” campaign. I believe that all areas of
our ward
should have publicly available green space, and am excited about the
possibility of community partnerships to increase the number of
community
gardens and allotments throughout the ward, but particularly Ainslie
Wood and
Strathcona North.
Eroglu --- Yes. Every
opportunity should be
seized to create and protect green spaces. Greenspaces should be
considered
outdoor community centers where enables citizens use for activities and
invest
in for its health benefits and for protecting wildlife and nature. When
we
improve parks, we’re really improving quality of life.
Cole --- I believe
that development must
respect and apply safe, green technologies, which are not only good for
the
environment, but provide assurances to residents that re-development
protects
Ward 1’s vibrant green spaces and wetlands.
Anderson --- I would like
the City to look
into enhancing properties it already owns such as the rail trail and
Alexander
Park, in particular paving the rail trail to Old Ancaster Road. I would
also
like the City to partner with private interests such as McMaster
University,
the Forest Glen Condominium, and the White Chapel Memorial Gardens to
increase
the connectivity of the existing trail systems of Ainslie Wood, as well
as
making better use of privately held park space by the Condominium and
McMaster
by allowing the surrounding community to share their green space with
the City
providing enhancements such as playgrounds and new trail connections to
the
community. I would also work with Alectra to make better use of the
hydro
corridors throughout Ainslie Wood where it is safe to do so. In addition
I
would like the City to review the possibility of purchasing the lot next
to the
Yeshiva of Hamilton (formerly Princess Elizabeth Montessori School) on
Bowman
Street and the lot in the SW corner of Alexander Park.
Allen --- I’m not sure
how you increase
greenspace in a fully developed neighbourhood without expropriating
property,
and I’m not prepared to do that. That said, I intend to focus on
enhancing
those green spaces and making them more enjoyable and safe for everyone.
14. WARD ONE'S CURRENT COUNCILLOR SPENT MOST OF
THE
AREA RATING MONEY IN KIRKENDALL AND WESTDALE, WHICH ALREADY HAVE MUCH
MORE
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE THAN THE REST OF THE WARD. STRATHCONA GOT VERY
LITTLE
AREA RATING SPENDING AND AINSLIE WOOD -- THE POOREST AND THE
LEAST-SERVICED OF
ALL OF THE WARD ONE NEIGHBOURHOODS -- GOT ALMOST ZERO AREA RATING
SPENDING. AS
COUNCILLOR, WILL YOU TREAT "HAVE-NOT" NEIGHBOURHOODS MORE FAIRLY?
Wilson --- We need a
transparent and
consistent approach to every aspect of city building to maintain the
confidence
of residents and to ensure all residents, regardless of their postal
code, are
treated fairly. For example, when we require residents to petition for
speed
reduction mechanism (such as speed bumps) we necessarily favour
residents who
are best equipped to advocate. Other residents, for reasons of language,
knowledge, shift work and length of residency may not be able to access
government and advocate for necessary changes.
White --- If elected to
council, I look
forward to implementing a more equal approach to the ward. As a resident
in the
Strathcona neighbourhood I think that the current councillor did cater
more
towards Westdale and Kirkendall than the other neighbourhoods. I believe
this
to be a result of the PBAC system implemented and would reform the
current
program to make spending more equitable.
Narducci --- See question 3
Massie ---
Yes, for political
reasons you may focus on certain parts of a Ward to win, but as an
elected
councillor you must govern for all.
Lazich --- I believe
each area should be
fairly treated and money allocated accordingly. However with respect to
Area
Rating, I believe the original concept of area rating was to be used for
infrastructure and therefore would prefer that money to be used as it
was
originally intended.
Geffos --- Absolutely. I was born in low-income
housing in Ward One,
live in the far west end of Ainslie Wood, and have family in Strathcona
North:
I am intimately familiar with the way that working class and low-income
neighbourhoods
and buildings are viewed and treated both by wealthier neighbourhoods
and by
Council. In fact, one of the reasons I am running is because I felt and
saw
this disparity: when discussing the possibility of my run with friends
who live
in Kirkendall, they didn’t understand why I felt under-represented:
their
neighbourhood has always had their concerns addressed promptly by
Council. I
don’t need to tell you that this is often not the case for Ainslie Wood.
I look
forward to working with all communities in our ward to ensure that all
voices
are well-represented at City Hall, not just those who live in
well-resources
and wealthy neighbourhoods.
Eroglu --- Absolutely. I
believe in open,
transparent and public engagement. Fairness in allocating recourses is
deeply
important for a more inclusive and prosper communities.
Cole --- Simply put,
yes. I believe for
the most part in abolishing ward area rating across the city to more
fairly and
equitably distribute costs which have demonstrated to be of benefit to
the city
as a whole. I still believe in establishing reserves which should
continue to
be allocated to Wards for their unique needs and as mentioned above with
respect to PBAC, I believe in having the community’s PBAC help determine
how
these funds would be used and if necessary, re-allocated.
Anderson --- As Councillor
I would review the
current distribution of public infrastructure throughout the Ward and
work with
staff to identify under serviced areas. I would then attempt to improve
those
areas while balancing the needs of the rest of the Ward for repairs and
replacements of existing infrastructure. Where servicing is equal I
would
strive to make sure that the funding for required repairs and
replacements is
evenly distributed throughout the Ward. My first priority for all
projects will
be public safety. This may mean that certain areas receive more funds in
some
years in order to address projects with a greater safety concern. For
area
rating specifically, if it continues, I would adjust the participatory
budget
process to ensure each neighbourhood receives roughly the same amount
for
neighbourhood specific projects.
Allen --- My comments
about the ForWard1
process are above.
15. WILL YOU PURCHASE THE PROPERTY TO THE
SOUTH-WEST
OF ALEXANDER PARK, FOR BOTH COMMUNITY USE AND AS POTENTIAL CONSIDERATION
FOR A
REC-CENTRE DEAL WITH THE FRENCH PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD?
Wilson --- Very
unlikely. My understanding
is that the building is for sale (a place of worship at present) but I
am
unaware of the price and of any condition of sale. There is an existing
facility close to the parking lot presently in use by the minor baseball
association but this use is seasonal. A possible partnership with the
association would make better sense to me in terms of financial
viability.
White --- This is not a
decision I alone
can make. Be wary of any candidate that makes a promise like this, it is
not a
promise they can make. A decision like that would require approval from
council, so it would really depend on the ability of the candidate to
work with
other councillors to demonstrate the importance of this decision. I
would love
to work with residents of Ainslie Wood to demonstrate to other
councillors why
this is a decision the city should invest in.
Narducci --- See question 3
Massie --- I
am open to
considering all options, if we don't have the tax revenue to do it then
we use
private public partnerships to get what benefits the community.
Lazich --- Once again ,
since I am not privy
to all the discussions / information and dealings that have occurred
regarding
this property I would prefer to study the project in detail prior to
making any
final decisions. Having said that I totally support a
rec-centre/community
centre as it would bring the neighbourhood together and provide a place
that
would provide extracurricular activities for all.
Geffos --- I would strongly consider it. My
understanding is that if the
French School Board no longer wishes to develop the land for a school,
it will
be tendered for purchase and the province, city, and school boards will
have
priority. If it does come up for purchase, I will strongly advocate for
its
purchase by the city for the eventual purpose of a rec centre /
community hub.
Eroglu --- This is something
needs to be
discussed and decided with the community input into the matter. I
support
everything that benefits the public and creates opportunities for
improving the
health and wellbeing of the community.
Cole --- I strongly
support the intent;
however it would be premature for me to provide a definitive yes or no.
These
are considerations which I am still learning about and require further
research
and consultation on my part.
Anderson --- Yes. However
it will be subject
to Council approval.
Allen --- While that
property is for sale,
the cost of it would likely leave nothing for construction. There has
been
$300K set aside from area rating money for a facility at the park. It’s
possible that the baseball building could be expanded, but in both
cases, we are
left with the fact that there is no money in the city budget to expand
programming to these locations. That’s why in 2014 when this discussion
came
up, I proposed not a city run rec centre, but a community run centre
similar in
principal to the Eva Rothwell centre. If this came to pass, as a
councillor, I
would work with community groups to take up residence in the building
and
provide programming (and possible child care) for people living in
Ainslie
Wood.
16. AS AINSLIE WOOD IS THE LEAST RESOURCED
NEIGHBORHOOD
IN WARD 1, WHAT WILL YOU DO TO ENSURE AINSLIE WOOD IS GIVEN FUNDING FOR
PUBLIC
SERVICES AND PUBLIC SPACES TO MOVE TOWARDS EQUALITY WITH THE OTHER WARD 1
NEIGHBORHOODS?
Wilson --- I'll work
closely with the
neighbourhood association to identify priorities. I will advocate within
the
city's budget for enhanced Ainslie Wood services. Finally, I will review
the
allocation of area rating money to ensure fair allocation between ward 1
neighbourhoods in light of historic allocations and attempting to seek
fairness.
White --- I have not
seen any information
that suggests a significant discrepancy in access to public facilities
in Ward
1. I need some clarification on what you mean by less resourced, as
every
neighbourhood in Ward 1 and the City of Hamilton has different levels of
access
to a plethora of facilities and resources.
Narducci --- See question 3
Massie ---
Why haven't we moved
to equality? It's a really good question. I think this is where
politicians are
going to have to develop a spine and say "So no, in this Ward what we do
as a community is look after people".
Lazich --- As mentioned I
feel that every
neighbourhood be treated fairly and would advocate as such . The same as
I
would for Strathcona, Westdale and Kirkendall. The needs of each area
should be
defined but the ward needs to work together as one.
Geffos --- I believe strongly that funding should
always be based on
need and never on the ability of a community to be the loudest, as this
often
results in money going to neighbourhoods where people already have the
resources and financial capital to mobilize around an issue. I aim to
build
capacity and civic engagement in all areas of the ward, but particularly
in
under-resourced neighbourhoods like Ainslie Wood and parts of the North
End of
Strathcona. I will work with residents, community organizations, and
grassroots
organizers to ensure that we address areas where the needs are the
greatest and
not simply those who are able to be loudest.
Eroglu --- Absolutely. I will
make sure that no
neighbourhood falls behind and ignored. Fair treatment is vital.
Cole --- Again, I
believe I have stated my
position above on equitable funding and changes that need to occur on a
city-wide basis.
Anderson --- I would
review the projects being
proposed for the Ward as part of the City's budget process and
prioritize any
new infrastructure projects based on the infrastructure gaps identified
for the
various neighbourhoods. This should result in a more equal distribution
of
infrastructure throughout the Ward.
Allen --- My
introduction to neighbourhood
disparity in Ward 1 was during the ForWared1 process, when I represented
Strathcona on the committee. I am very aware of the lack of investment
in
Ainslie Wood, and would prioritize it and Strathcona for any opportunity
for
investment in the ward beyond just that Forward1 process.
17. WHAT IS YOUR POSITION ON BIKE LANES IN THE
WEST
END?
Wilson --- It is the
interest of car drivers
and cyclists for the city to design, build and implement a consistent
approach
to bike lane design across the west end, Ward 1 and the city. My
campaign calls
for a connected, continuous and protected series of bike lanes.
White --- I support the
gradual
implementation of bike lanes throughout the city. I would like to see
completed
bike circuits and improved ridership on these areas rather than single
bike
lanes on streets. I believe that cycling is important, but it needs to
be
implemented in reality. I would like to see protected bike lanes on
major streets
as most research demonstrates that this makes both cyclist and driver
feel
safer. I believe we need stricter enforcement on biking by-laws and this
can be
used to increase funding. I also believe Hamilton needs to at the very
least
reach the level of spending outlined in the City Master Plan for
cycling.
Currently we are only spending about half of what was recommended.
Studies have
demonstrated that when bike lanes are built properly, and provide access
to
major community centres,rider ship improves and so does economic
performance.
Protected bike lanes have also resulted in a reduction in car-on-car
collisions, car-on-cyclist collisions and finally car-on-pedestrian
collisions.
Bike lanes can provide significant benefits to those in the west end if
implemented
properly.
Narducci --- I would like
to see bikes lanes
extended through the west end and all the way to Dundas.
Massie ---
Not much work has
been done at the city on bike lanes in the west end - my involvement
with Cycle
Hamilton so far has led me to believe that local citizens have already
figured
out the optimal safest routes and deficiencies and need to be at the
planning
table for any actions to be taken.
Lazich --- I think that
we need to have
smart planning in place for bike lanes as well as any other new
developments or
initiatives that occur . Its about “collective travel” and considering
the
“Vision Zero”.
Geffos --- I am strongly in favour of protected bike
lanes. As it
stands, east-west cycling infrastructure exists in the West End (the
rail
trail, Sanders, King St.) but North-South infrastructure is lacking. I
will
work with residents to develop a street plan that works for all of us,
and
which ensures that we are all able to get where we need to go regardless
of
what method of transportation we choose.
Eroglu --- Cycling is in my
platform. I believe
dedicated, protected bike lanes should be part of every road design. I
believe
that every road with a speed limits of over 30 km/hr should have a
protected
bike lane. I will work with other councillors to implement a strategy
that
includes safe and continuous routes that connects communities across the
city
and motivates people to ride their bikes more. Increasing the number of
protected bike lanes is vital not only for Ward 1 but also for Hamilton
in
general. Riding on streets mixed with fast moving cars is unsafe and
stressful.
Protected lanes will help reduce stress not only for cyclists but also
for
drivers and reduce the conflicts between all road users. It encourages
more
people to ride their bikes and promotes health. Protected bike lanes and
protected intersections are key for biking accessible for cyclists
ranging from
experienced to those who are just starting. I think it should be
mandatory
design element for all new road designs and incorporated into the
existing
roads if possible.
Cole --- I believe in
the spirit of
‘Vision Zero’ adopted by a number of municipalities around the globe,
which
challenges all of us to achieve zero fatalities and serious injuries, by
re-thinking road safety. To make human error part of the equation and
thereby
aim for safer streets through improved education, enforcement,
engineering,
evaluation and engagement. I believe in bike lanes for the west-end that
incorporate engineering designs, including identifiers, warning systems
and
barriers to alert motorists and protect cyclists and pedestrians.
Anderson --- Bike lanes
need to be improved
with continuity (i.e. no abrupt lane terminations) being a key focus.
Data from
the Sobi Bikes would need to be reviewed to identify the most common
routes
used by cyclists in order to prioritize projects.
Allen --- I
support bike lanes,
but doing them in a strategic way. The current network of bike lanes
appears to
the casual observer to be ad hoc and poorly planned. I would work to
ensure
that bike lanes go on streets that make sense, and connect to form an
effective
route for traveling both in the west end and beyond.
18. WHAT IS YOUR VISION/PLAN FOR ALEXANDER PARK
AS A
WHOLE, IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT A MASTER PLAN WAS NEVER DEVELOPED?
Wilson --- Champion the
need for a master
plan, in partnership with the neighbourhood association. My vision for
the Park
is that it reflect the needs and hopes of the neighbourhood, including a
facility to host neighbourhood events because parks have always played a
role
in connecting neighbours and building social capital. My own personal
view of
parks is that they make space for different kinds of needs (passive,
active)
and cater to all ages, that they offer shade, sitting areas, and are
accessible.
White --- To be honest I
do not have a
vision for Alexander park specifically. I was unaware that there was no
master
plan for the park, and find it fairly ridiculous that one was not
created. I
would like to work with residents of Ainslie Wood to establish a
realistic
outline for what we hope to see at Alexander park in the future. As
someone who
played tee-ball there as a kid, I realize the importance of the park to
residents and the need for a concrete plan to improve the facility.
Narducci --- See question 3
Massie --- I
envision a
community centre that everyone can use year round.
Lazich --- I understand
that new splash pads
were just installed which is a great start , however I believe more can
be done
to make it a more inclusive active community focal point. These could
include
expanded play area, maybe a rec centre of some sort, a nature activity
centre
possibly that would be educational for all.. there are many options that
could
expand upon the park’s viability but all stakeholders need to be
involved.
Geffos --- My understanding is that when the splash
pad was developed,
there was also consideration given to the installation of a skate park. I
am
strongly in favour of this and of other community infrastructure in
Alexander
Park, and will work with the neighbourhood residents to develop a master
plan
for Alexander Park. I believe that Carter Park in the Stinson
neighbourhood is
a model of what parks can be in our city. It is constantly in use by
both
independent groups and the community association, there are barbecues
and
community meetings frequently, and the splash pad, playground equipment,
and
basketball infrastructure are in constant use. We have a real need for
outdoor
athletic infrastructure that is not operated by McMaster University or
the
school board. In 2015 when I was training for the Wheelchair Basketball
World
Championships, and therefore training upwards of 40 hours a week, I had
to
leave Ainslie Wood in order to access outdoor basketball courts, often
bussing
to Victoria Park. In an ideal world, Alexander Park would function as a
park
and community hub, with outdoor athletic infrastructure and a community
centre
with bookable spaces.
Eroglu --- It is something
that the community
must to come together and decide the best use of the park for the best
interest
of the community. I will support and be behind any project that the
community
wants to implement.
Cole --- Alexander
Park represents some of
the best of what the city’s green spaces offer to people of all ages -
sports,
recreation, scenic beauty, trails, falls, the escarpment. My vision
would be to
maintain this attractive green space and only consider outdoor
recreational
developments that compliment the natural beauty of the space, respect
the
environment and encourage outdoor recreational use. As mentioned above
I’m also
supportive in principle of adjacent development that addresses the
community’s
recreational & community centre needs.
Anderson --- Construction
of a community
centre in the NW corner, with or without a school board partnership.
Re-establish the hydro line trail from Whitney/Emerson to Iona and
include a
new paved trail to the splash pad area from this trail cutting across
the park
between the ball diamonds. A community garden, nuttery and orchard in
the SW
corner and southern end of the park, complete with a walking trail and
raised
garden beds designed to accommodate those with mobility issues and
including an
accessible public washroom. The interior border of the park transformed
into a
living hedge for a wildlife corridor complete with plants for
pollinators. The
entire space should be designed in a way which is flexible enough to
accommodate community events.
Allen --- I fully
support a master plan
process for Alexander Park. I was involved in the end of the Victoria
Park
master plan, and believe the process can be a valuable tool for
understanding
what amenities residents are looking for, and what they dream of for
their
green space.
19. IF AINSLIE WOOD'S DESIGNATED AREA RATING
MONEY WERE
TO BE SPENT IN ANOTHER NEIGHBOURHOOD, WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT CORRUPTION
AND
WOULD THAT JUSTIFY A LAWSUIT OR A COMPLAINT TO THE INTEGRITY
COMMISSIONER
AGAINST THE COUNCILLOR?
Wilson --- No. It is my
understanding that
$1.5 million has been set aside for Ainslie Wood from the PBAC exercise.
It was
and remains my position that this money is earmarked for Ainslie Wood
and I
support this assumption.
White --- Again this
question is unclear.
Officially speaking no area rating money is designated for a specific
neighbourhood. I cannot speak for any unofficial promises made by
previous
incumbents. I would like to see the money spent more evenly across the
neighbourhoods, as I feel that Westdale and Kirkendall got significant
funding
for a variety of projects that have not been seen in recent years.
Again, since
there is no official documentation stating that the Ainslie Wood
neighbourhood
was entitled to x dollars of the area rating fund it cannot be
considered, in
the official sense, as corruption. But it was likely a corruption of
trust
between citizens and the councillor, something I do not intend to
repeat. I
hope you can tell through my answers to these questions that I am an
honest
candidate. I plan to be upfront with constituents and not make false
promises I
cannot keep.
Narducci --- I can only
speak as to what I
would do as councilor and if that means money designated for a
particular area,
then it should be spent there.
Massie ---
If money is earmarked
for Ainslie Woods and there are clear rules to follow then the
underlying
foundation of the complaint is sufficient to seek legal advice.
Lazich --- As mentioned,
I feel that area
rating money should be used as it was originally intended, which would /
should
resolve any “misspending” done.
Geffos --- Yes.
Eroglu --- I don’t think it
is fair and would not
support designated area rating money to be spend for somewhere else.
Whether or
not it is considered corruption, I don’t know. It is out of my
expertise, but I
know and believe that it is not right.
Cole --- As mentioned
above, I believe for
the most part in abolishing ward area rating across the city to more
fairly and
equitably distribute costs which have demonstrated to be of benefit to
the city
as a whole. I still believe in establishing reserves which should
continued to
be allocated to Wards for their unique needs and as mentioned above with
respect to PBAC, I believe in having the community’s PBAC help determine
how
these funds would be used and if necessary re-allocated.
Anderson --- Money which
has been set aside
for a specific project should be spent on the project it was designated
for.
The only exception should be if the neighbourhood that the money was set
aside
for determined as a group that they wished the money to be spent on a
different
project within the same neighbourhood.
Allen --- I’m not sure
how to answer this
question, as it seems to have been driven by a specific incident that I
do not
have knowledge of. I think a healthy dialogue and mutual respect between
the
Councillor and the neighbourhood would avoid such unpleasantness.
20. DO YOU LIVE IN WARD ONE?
Wilson --- Yes.
White --- Yes, I reside
in the Strathcona
neighbourhood and have been a resident all of my life.
Narducci --- Yes I do and
have lived in this area
for over 30 years. I do believe that it is important to live in the
community
that you are seeking to represent. I’ve seen the transition in this
community
from quiet walkable streets to now heavy traffic speeding through our
neighborhoods, where, with these speeds, all it takes is a sneeze and
pedestrians’ lives are threatened. I’ve seen the students and homeowners
in
McMaster area struggle as progress has been made towards respectful
cohabitating. I’ve seen the increase in homelessness on our street
corners and
the lines growing longer at our local churches for food vouchers. By
living
here I also see the benefits of the energy and ideas of the many people
moving
here and think about how to make this city great for all of us. These
things
you see, living in a ward, there’s issues but also progress and
opportunities.
By living in and experiencing the community you have a deeper
understanding of
the work that needs to be done.
Massie --- No, I live on
the boundary close
enough that my wife walks to McMaster to work, our kids play in Jackson
Playground, Victoria Park, Churchill and Beulah Park, we biked to our
community
garden in the aviary, and walk the trails at Chedoke and Cootes - I
deliberately chose to run in Ward 1 - I have no favourites. I have
experience
living beside a very large student residence, transit issues, high
taxes, and
stood up against intensification development that ignores bylaws and
citizens
rights, and comes at the expense of green space and wildlife habitat. I
understand the local issues large and small. I have proven business
leadership.
I am running to represent ALL areas and people of Ward 1.
Lazich --- Yes! I have
lived in Ward 1 for
over 30 years and married into a family who has had (still has) a
business in
Ward 1 for over 65 years.
Geffos --- Yes. I’m a
proud resident of
Ainslie Wood.
Eroglu --- My family and I
moved to West Hamilton
in 2003 and lived in communities of Strathcona, Westdale and Ainslie
Wood. I
raised my son, Matthew, here in West Hamilton. He went to school from
elementary, middle school at Dalewood and to high school at Westdale
Secondary.
I launched and operated a café business in Westdale Village that was
sold in
2007. Although
currently
I live in an adjacent community, for many years I lived in west
Hamilton, raised my family there. We had to move to a place that is
within a
walking distance to my work due to an accident that I broke my knee and
could
not drive to work. I know the area and the community very well and I
have deep
connections with having family members currently living in the area. It
is a
place with loving memories, a special place for me and my family.
Cole ---
No. I live on the
border of Wards 1 and 2. I do believe you have to fully understand and
experience the community you represent and that only comes from having a
long-term relationship with the community. Our child was born at the
McMaster
University Medical Centre. And our child attended McMaster as part of
his post-secondary
education. We have friends and family that live in Ward 1. Ward 1 is
where I
shop, where we by our groceries, where we access health care and our
pharmacy,
where we dine out and entertain, and where we hike, bike and enjoy life.
I have
worked in the Ward, and now provide services through my business to
other
businesses and services within the Ward.
Anderson --- Yes. In
Ainslie Wood East.
Allen --- Yes.
[end of questions]